Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Senate’

The Paycheck Fairness Act (S. 3220) is a commonsense bill that would deter wage discrimination by closing loopholes in current law. The bill takes meaningful steps to create incentives for employers to follow the law, empower women to negotiate for equal pay, and strengthen federal outreach and enforcement efforts. It would also bar retaliation against employees who disclose their own wages. Without this bill, employers can penalize and even fire workers for talking about their salaries. This egregious practice leaves employees in the dark and prevents them from finding out about pay discrimination in the workplace.

AAUW and fair-pay advocate Lilly Ledbetter, the author of Grace and Grit: My Fight for Equal Pay and Fairness at Goodyear and Beyond, have been working hard to get the word out on Capitol Hill. Ledbetter even gave AAUW and Lisa Maatz, our director of public policy and government relations, a shout-out during her appearance on the Rachel Maddow Show on Monday night.

Watch the clip below, read about last week’s House vote on the Paycheck Fairness Act, and stay tuned to find out more about how the Senate vote turns out.

Read Full Post »

Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

—    Section One of the Equal Rights Amendment

On this day in 1972, Congress passed the Equal Rights Amendment. In the 40 years since, it has been ratified by 35 states — it needs 38 to be added to the Constitution. Given that the ERA was first introduced in 1923, the process has been long, strenuous, and oftentimes disheartening. Undoubtedly, we should celebrate this 40th anniversary, but as we celebrate, we must also reflect on the work still left to be done.

Every time I study the ERA, I am always shocked both at how long it took to get through Congress and at how stagnant it has been since. What needs to be done to persuade the skeptics? What can we do to ensure that women in the United States will be permanently guaranteed equality? This last question deeply resonates with me. The past few months have brought one attack after another on women and women’s health — so many, in fact, that the term “war on women” is becoming commonplace. With such a battle being waged against women’s basic human rights, the passage and adoption of the ERA seems not only fundamental but urgent.

I am not so naive that I believe that the ratification of the ERA would completely eliminate gender-based discrimination, and it is indisputable that women have more rights now than when Congress passed the ERA 40 years ago. But how are we to successfully dismantle the discriminatory practices in our country if there is no mandate in our Constitution that says that we must? The ERA would build a solid foundation on which to continue — and to grow — the work of ending gender-based discrimination.

Only three more states must ratify the ERA to make it the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution — only three more states are needed to make history for women.

Today, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) introduced a resolution in the Senate to extend the timeframe for ratification and to help move forward the three-state strategy, which would pick up where the previous ratification by 35 states left off. He joins Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), who introduced a similar proposal in the House, and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), who have introduced resolutions to pass the ERA all over again. It is my hope that women focus their surge of advocacy in response to the war on women to ensure that we finally see the ERA ratified by 38 states and added to our Constitution.

This post was written by AAUW Public Policy Intern Jordan Jones.

Read Full Post »

When I was in seventh grade, I spent my time thinking about school work, my friends, and my after-school activities. I did not give much consideration to my body and how it was developing. This all changed on the day that 40 of my female classmates and I will never forget.

Two boys (who were close friends with the group) thought it would be funny to make a list of all the girls and rate them based on various attributes. “The List,” as we referred to it, had categories such as chest, body type, personality, and the dreaded comments section. Some examples of their thought-provoking observations were “mosquito-bite chest” and “makes wide right turns.” The List was intended to be a joke and never to leave the boys’ homes, yet somehow it surfaced, and copies were distributed throughout my middle school.

As I reflect on this “typical” middle school situation (AAUW’s recent report, Crossing the Line: Sexual Harassment at School, says that 48 percent of the surveyed students experienced some form of sexual harassment in the last school year), a number of thoughts come to mind. First, this experience was mortifying for all of the girls who were targeted. For the first time, we were made aware of our physical characteristics, while they were displayed for everyone to read. Already vulnerable, we developed insecurities that stayed with all of us. I mentioned to my friend that I was writing about The List, and her response was “I am still haunted by the memory.” These boys’ words remain 15 years later.

Fortunately, there is legislation in Congress to help schools put an end to the bullying and harassment that still goes on. The Safe Schools Improvement Act (S. 506/H.R. 1648), a bipartisan bill, would ensure that states, districts, and schools have policies in place prohibiting bullying and harassment and that schools implement education programs designed to teach students about the issues around and consequences of bullying and harassment. The hope is to prevent situations like The List in the future. We have to teach students that their words are damaging, that victims have available resources in counselors and school authorities, and that schools must do what they can to prevent and respond to bullying and harassment. The Safe Schools Improvement Act is vital for students. Last week, through AAUW’s Action Network, more than 600 members sent a letter to Congress expressing their support.

Although both boys and girls experience sexual harassment, AAUW’s report found that it is much more common for girls. The AAUW Action Fund’s nonpartisan, nationwide My Vote campaign — a voter education and turnout effort — will certainly keep the pressure on candidates to stand up and prevent sexual harassment. You can learn more about the effort on AAUW’s blog and by visiting www.aauwaction.org.

This post was written by AAUW Public Policy Intern Caroline Talev.

Read Full Post »

Dear super committee,

How are you? I ask because, although you’ve been tasked with finding a way to trim the federal deficit by at least $1.2 trillion over the next decade, you haven’t been that public about what you’ve been up to. So I thought I’d check in and offer some ideas.

Super committee, we need to talk. There are all these crazy rumors flying around town that you’re 1) doomed to failure and won’t achieve anything at all, 2) going to exceed expectations and cut up to $4 trillion from the federal deficit, or 3) only reducing the deficit by about $600 billion and leaving the rest for the next Congress to deal with. So it’s been a little hard to figure out what your final proposal, due to Congress the day before Thanksgiving, will look like. Allow me to make some suggestions.

First, any package must be balanced. None of this nonsense about cutting programs for the hungry, young, and weak — like food stamps or Head Start — while not even looking to bring in additional revenues from the most powerful or wealthiest. No sirree. Any package you come up with must include additional revenues, not additional hardships.

Second, your proposal should create capacity, not destroy it. While some people argue that Pell Grants for college students or job training for those whose industries have moved overseas is expensive, think about how much human potential we would lose if we didn’t provide these opportunities. Your proposal should recognize that certain dollars spent today can create hundreds of dollars for our economy in the future. You shouldn’t risk our country’s capacity for greatness by cutting this funding.

Finally, the proposal should honor the commitments we’ve made to one another. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are promises that we’ve made as a society — no one will starve or die because they’re too poor or old. It’s that simple, and your proposal needs to recognize that and leave these programs alone.

I hope these suggestions help. These are tough budgetary times, and you’re facing difficult decisions. But this argument isn’t just about numbers; it’s about who we are and who we want to be as a country. I, for one, urge you to create a sensible, balanced proposal that allows our economy to grow and lets Americans live in dignity and prosperity.

Best,

Beth

Read Full Post »

In the few months I’ve been participating in the AAUW Action Fund Lobby Corps, we’ve twice lobbied members of Congress to support bills that heighten the solvency of the Social Security system and ensure that it is not lumped into the deficit debate. Both times, congressional staff members have commented on my age and asked why I, as a young woman, care about Social Security.

I care because Social Security is the program through which Americans support each other across generational divides. I care because my grandmother relies on Social Security and because my dad isn’t far from retirement age. I care because I pay into the system every two weeks, and if certain members of Congress get their way, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will be targeted as part of the deficit reduction plan, reducing benefits for millions of Americans.

On Wednesday, several Democratic representatives held a press conference to announce their opposition to reducing Social Security as part of deficit reduction. Reps. John Conyers (D-MI), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), John Olver (D-MA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Janice Hahn (D-CA), David Cicilline (D-RI), and Hansen Clarke (D-MI) gathered on the Capitol lawn to express their joint message: Hands off Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid!

The members asserted that deficit reduction must be addressed by putting Americans back to work, not by disproportionately burdening seniors, women, and the middle class.

The current Social Security system is more than just a retirement program; across its lifespan, it has been one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation’s history, providing benefits to many children, disabled workers, surviving spouses, and retirees.

As a member of a generation whose Social Security future is already not so secure, I think that protecting the Social Security system for seniors, women, children, and the multitude of others who benefit from it is the best way to ensure that Americans continue caring for each other across the generations.

This post was written by AAUW Public Policy Intern Katie Donlevie.

Read Full Post »

Dear Professor Hill,

When I told friends about my weekend trip to New York to attend the conference in your honor — Sex, Power, and Speaking Truth: Anita Hill 20 Years Later — many of them did not know who you were. And who can blame them? Many of us were just 3 years old, or perhaps not even alive, when your name came into America’s living rooms in 1991, and my high school history class wasn’t exactly focused on women’s issues.

So I was curious. What happens when my friends or others go looking to find out who you are and how you changed the course of history?

Anita Hill testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill. A portion of the photo gallery is in the background.

Well, they’ll go to Google, and they will enter in your name or something about the confirmation hearings. Then they’ll click on the first link that comes up — Wikipedia — and get a tiny education in the story of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings

Unfortunately, neither the entry on you nor the one on the actual confirmation hearings does the story the justice it deserves.

Wikipedia doesn’t mention that the Senate Judiciary Committee tried to move ahead with the confirmation vote without considering known charges of sexual harassment, and it forgets about the seven gutsy congresswomen who marched to the Senate Democrats’ caucus meeting to demand that you be allowed to testify, not taking no for an answer.

Both entries fail to document how the all-white, all-male Senate committee treated you with outrageous disrespect and judgment. Watching your testimony is both sickening and amazing. Some of the questions were so frustrating, so Kafkaesque. And yet you responded with grace, dignity, and patience, qualities that surely helped you become a pioneer for black women in law.

None of this comes through in the story Wikipedia tells. Nor does the story indicate the painful tears in the black community as it struggled with race, gender, and politics in choosing whom to support in this ugly fight. Nor does it indicate how Thomas has in many ways betrayed his civil rights background and ruled against free speech, tolerance, rules for good business practice, the list goes on.

In Wikipedia’s defense, it gets a couple things right.

It pays tribute to your career, highlighting that the confirmation hearings were a historical event, but just that. This is not your story. It does not define you, and it has not stopped you. You faced fear and hate with bravery and dignity, and in the aftermath, you soared to great heights.

Wikipedia also acknowledges that your testimony helped launch “modern-day public awareness of the issue of sexual harassment in the United States.” Your words, broadcast over evening television, broke through the silence around sexual harassment. You, Professor Hill, started a song that has been growing louder ever since.

For this and more, I want to thank you.

Read Full Post »

Twenty years ago this week, Professor Anita Hill testified about sexual harassment before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the confirmation hearings for then-Supreme Court justice nominee Clarence Thomas. Hill used to work for Thomas and felt it was her duty to share her experiences of sexual harassment in her workplace. In the end, Thomas was still appointed as a justice, and he continues to be one today.

Two decades later, it is clear that the hearings were a pivotal moment in our nation’s history.

Working women across the nation identified with what Hill said, and her testimony opened up the floodgates. In record numbers, women shared their sexual harassment stories, and in just a few years, the number of sexual harassment complaints filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission doubled.

Hill’s testimony ultimately changed how we think about sexual harassment. Before, it was seen as a personal problem and something women should handle with a sense of humor or thick skin. Hill’s testimony helped people understand that sexual harassment is discrimination and a tactic that both men and women use to oust others from a workplace.

The disbelieving, hostile way the all-male Senate Judiciary Committee treated Hill and the subsequent confirmation of Thomas to the Supreme Court led to several women being elected to the Senate the following election year in what was dubbed the “Year of the Woman.”

Tomorrow, Saturday, October 15, Hunter College in New York City is hosting a daylong summit on workplace sexual harassment, and Hill is the keynote speaker. Panelists will host sessions such as What Happened, What Does Anita Hill Mean to You, and What Have We Learned in 20 Years and What Comes Next?

AAUW is one of the many conference co-sponsors, and we will host one of the lunchtime discussions. Ours will focus on the sexual harassment of teenagers in schools and on the streets.

For the majority of you who cannot be there, you can watch via live streaming on the conference website. If you’re on Twitter, follow @anitahill20 and view live updates by following the hashtag #AnitaHill. AAUW will cover the event on our blog early next week.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »